With the imminent release of the 3G iPhone coming up, lots of people will be lining up to take advantage of the 3G goodness, both people newly enticed over to Apple's dark (okay, white) side and buyers of the old iPhone looking to upgrade. New iPhone owners will quickly learn what we current iPhone owners already know: those stock white earbuds just aren't going to cut it. They're barely adequate for giving and receiving calls--and for music? Fuhgeddaboudit.
With that in mind, here are three recent iPhone headsets I've put through their paces over the past two weeks, ranging from $79 to $179. Each set of headphones here comes with its own pros and cons. For each item we'll talk about the style and ruggedness, the sound quality of the earphone, and the quality of the mic.
1) Skullcandy FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) Earbuds -- $79
Style: Skullcandy has long been known for their visual flash, and with their flashy colors and little skulls on the earphone casings I can't lie that wearing these around made me feel a little bit like the "too old to be here guy". The consciously "extreme" styling of these headphones is either going to be the biggest pro or the biggest con, depending on who's looking. The FMJs come in black, silver, and chrome, with the silver being the least flashy of the three, since the skull decals and logo blend into the earphone making them invisible from a distance.
Despite the flashiness the FMJs are sufficiently rugged, with a coiled metal cable and reinforced grommets at the post and mic. I'm not worried that the cord will fray at the post or pop out of the casing, which has happened to me plenty of times with cheaper headphones.
Sound: Alas, the FMJs sound better than the stock iPhone earbuds, but not by much. Bass, which FMJs are designed to emphasize, is fairly strong but also muddy and indistinct. The midranges are extremely tinny and the treble sounds hollow to nonexistent, making music sound a little sucked-out overall. Playing with the EQ on my iPhone did little to help the situation. Using presets that emphasized treble helped balance things out a bit, but clarity was definitely lacking.
Isolation is better than average, meaning that with the right-sized eartip you can block out most ambient noise but some will still leak through. This is a point in the FMJ's favor: note that I don't think perfect isolation is ideal in an iPhone headset, as you'll see in my notes on the HF2 below. Also, the FMJs had the least microphonics or "cable noise".
Mic: Surprisingly, this is where the FMJ really shines. Out of the three headphones in this review, this mic had the best sensitivity and clarity for normal conversation without so much sensitivity that it picked up everything around me, meaning I would only have to talk half as loud to be heard even in areas with a lot of ambient noise such as a city street. Talking on the headset was actually a pleasure, as I never had a problem hearing or being understood, even when talking in a low conversational tone in a crowded coffeeshop.
Conclusion: If you like the styling and if you can see the FMJs more as a really good hands-free set that plays better-sounding music than the stock iPhone earbuds, then you'll feel happy about taking advantage of the lower price point. Otherwise you may want to pass.
2) V-MODA Vibe Duo (Version 2) Earphones -- $99
Style: Easily the best-looking of the three, the Vibe Duo is stylish without pomp, like a set of classy but understated earrings. The Duos come in either black or chrome, with a braided cable sheathed in plastic. The textured metal casings are extremely light, making the headphones weigh less than 12 grams. The post is easy to grip but sits a little high, meaning it occasionally snagged in my jacket pocket, but it wasn't a major issue. Simply put, these headphones look great.
Unfortunately what they aren't is rugged. A shirt clip is absolutely necessary with the Duos much of the time, especially when jogging--the casings are so light that the weight of the cord can yank on the grommets when running or even walking, which can eventually lead to the cord fraying or breaking at the casing.
Sound: I have to admit, I love the way these things sound. They are unapologetically bass-heavy, but treble isn't sacrificed entirely as with the FMJs and there's just enough midrange to add warmth and richness to the boom. The Duos, like V-MODA's Vibes and Bass Freqs, are tuned to sound a certain way so it's actually best to use a flat EQ setting with these. These are not "flat-response" headphones, which was a conscious design choice: they're tuned for electronic house music, which V-MODA has a confessed preference for, plus the particular tuning actually helps hide sound artifacts in digital music files compressed at lower bitrates. So using different EQ presets might unbalance the sound and muddy things up a bit, but on a flat setting the sound is superb.
Also, unlike with most so-named "canalphones", you can get great sound without actually having to place the earphone in your ear canal. The design of the casing has the earphone sitting shallowly in the ear, and doesn't require a perfect seal for good bass (though the better seated in the ear the earphone is, the better the sound). I was really happy about the fit, allowing me to pop the earphones in and out easily as needed without having to fight to get them back in with a proper seal. They were extremely comfortable to wear for long periods. I did however have a problem with cable noise, and when walking quickly or jogging you can actually hear the driver moving around in the casing when your iPhone is off, which isn't encouraging.
Isolation is the weakest of the three; the ease of the fit means that more sound leaks in. It's definitely better than an earbud-style headphone, and as a "street" headphone I found it useful to actually be able to hear oncoming traffic and fellow pedestrians. But since my last plane flight I can vouch for the fact that if you want to block out the crying baby in the next row, you're going to need to turn your volume up.
Mic: The mic on the Duos was the weakest of the three. People on the other end of the line often asked me to speak up, and ambient noise often made it difficult to be understood. It served adequately most of the time, but it was definitely not stellar.
Conclusion: They look and sound fantastic, and are extremely comfortable--but expect to have to take extra care against breakage. Structural reliability is the Duo's "Achilles' heel". Also, they're tuned for a certain sound so they don't play well with EQ presets.
3) Etymotic Research HF2 Earphones -- $179
Style: Designed by audiologists, not marketers or graphic designers, there's a very utilitarian look to the HF2s that make one expect to see them on FBI agents or air traffic controllers. They only come in black, and there's no styling to them whatsoever, being simply black on black with a white "L" on the left casing and an "R" on the right. The headphones are coated in a soft rubberized treatment that gives it a matte look and is pleasantly "grippy" and soft to the touch. They don't look bad at all, but they won't start any conversations either.
The cord is just in a thin rubber sheath, but feels sturdy. The grommets are part of the casings and are nearly half the size of the casings themselves, so I imagine it would be very difficult to break these during normal daily use.
Sound: Here's the best-kept secret about the HF2: the HF2 is just Etymotic's ER-4P with a mic added. ER-4s have (rightly) long been considered a gold standard for reference earphones and can cost upwards of $300. In those terms, getting an ER-4 plus a mic for $179 starts looking like a steal.
Not surprisingly, the sound is amazing. These are flat-response earphones in the truest sense, meaning that absolutely nothing gets in the way of your source. Unfortunately that also means that the HF2 functions on a "garbage in, garbage out" principle, which means you might hear compression artifacts and mild distortion if you're listening to digital music compressed at anything but the highest bitrates. But with good-quality music files, the sound is crystal clear, emphasizing nothing but also holding nothing back. This gives a lot more flexibility with your EQ settings, meaning you can set them to any preset and still get perfection, so it's just down to your preferences.
Isolation is not only the best of these three headphones, but maybe the best of any headphone, and I had no problem with cable noise. It's difficult to get a good seal with the flanged silicone earpieces without practice, but once you do, the world disappears. Note that this may not actually be something you want in an iPhone headset, as perfect isolation has two disadvantages: first, perfect isolation during physical movement can be disorienting and in some cases, such as jogging in an urban area, even dangerous--though it's definitely a godsend on planes, trains, and buses where you just want to tune out everyone around you. Second, perfect isolation makes it difficult to gauge your own voice during phone conversations. During calls I was often told I was talking too loud by both the caller and by people around me, because I couldn't tell what my own volume was. To avoid this I ended up always taking one earphone out during calls, which worked well during the call itself but the difficulty of getting the earphone back in with a good seal makes it cumbersome to do this in an environment where you expect to receive a lot of calls.
Mic: The mic is solid, with strong sensitivity. No one I called had trouble understanding me, but the increased sensitivity meant that the mic did tend to pick up ambient noise more easily, meaning that crowded rooms might be problematic.
Conclusion: Expensive, but you get true audiophile, reference-level sound quality with supreme isolation. Perfect for plane flights, buses, etc., not so much for walking or jogging. Be careful about your speaking volume when answering calls.
--Aric A.